Rapture(22:51:21)
well mirror, that was in 90s. maybe it was even the other way around? zip was new on, win95 ? so maybe THAT compressed 50% to wav, and ARJ sucked (MSDOS)
Rapture(22:50:54)
no i didn't. you did. (idiot etc)
mirrorbird(22:50:50)
opinions fine. but facts are facts. i'm waiting for your file that compresses better with arj than zip. any time. send me the file. and i will apologise. or you can say "i was wrong". that's not opinion.
mirrorbird(22:50:10)
however opinions are opinions, and facts are facts. you said "ARJ is better than ZIP", that's like saying "the sky is green" when it's blue. and i said: prove it. and you didn't prove it (which you could do, if it was true), you started calling me names.